Talk:Beowulf
From Gineipaedia, the Legend of Galactic Heroes wiki
(ship design question) |
Glacierfairy (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:As far as what section the commentary would go in, i would say under a 'Design' section or something. We don't have one, but you can create it. You might look to [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Pikachu_%28Pok%C3%A9mon%29#Physiology Bulbapedia] for inspiration; they do a similar thing with articles about Pokémon. <span style="color: #bbb"> ♥</span> [[User:kine|<span style="color: #359fef !important;">kine</span>]] @ 07:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | :As far as what section the commentary would go in, i would say under a 'Design' section or something. We don't have one, but you can create it. You might look to [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Pikachu_%28Pok%C3%A9mon%29#Physiology Bulbapedia] for inspiration; they do a similar thing with articles about Pokémon. <span style="color: #bbb"> ♥</span> [[User:kine|<span style="color: #359fef !important;">kine</span>]] @ 07:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Japanese name== | ||
| + | Am I mistaken, or does the Japanese name currently says "Barbarossa" instead of "Beowulf"? [[User:Glacierfairy|Glacierfairy]] 13:09, 4 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:09, 4 February 2013
Appearances
Editing this article brings up an interesting issue in terms of appearances- whilst its useful for ships like the Barbarossa to have each appearance noted, with a ship as prolific as the Beowulf, is it useful? I'm inclined to include them - but I'm a bit lazy tonight after searching for the perfect image of Beowulf, so maybe its best to add appearnaces as and when they're found until we have them all?Vympel 13:27, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's fine. I want the appearances there, but it's not necessary to get them all at once. Some Beowulf fan will eventually fill in any gaps. :) ♥ kine @ 13:52, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Ship design question
I'm wondering where to put commentary about the ship's design (it was inappropriate for "military service"). I don't think its unsourced to say that the Beowulf clearly resembles the Tristan - its intentional afterall, they're the ships of the Twin Stars (just like Eistla and Ulfrun look similar because Grillpalzer and Knapfstein were supposed to be the twin stars of the next generation). Maybe a seperate heading - same place to put the stuff from the fleet files, if we can ever translate them?Vympel 06:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- I would say it's appropriate to put a small remark about it in the body text somewhere, but i wouldn't expound upon it. (Just something like 'The Beowulf's design was similar to the Tristan's'.) For comparisons like Beowulf/Tristan vs Eistla/Ulfrun, i'd put that in the 'Background information' section, because there was nothing about either of these connection mentioned on the screen.
- As far as what section the commentary would go in, i would say under a 'Design' section or something. We don't have one, but you can create it. You might look to Bulbapedia for inspiration; they do a similar thing with articles about Pokémon. ♥ kine @ 07:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Japanese name
Am I mistaken, or does the Japanese name currently says "Barbarossa" instead of "Beowulf"? Glacierfairy 13:09, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
