Talk:Fleet File Collection Vol.1
From Gineipaedia, the Legend of Galactic Heroes wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Same as with Vol 2, the 2x "Command Battleships" are the Ahsgrimm / Asgrim. I'm going by Vol. 1R here, but yeah.~~~~") |
m (moved Talk:Fleet File Collection Volume 01 to Talk:Fleet File Collection Vol.1: renamed to match title used on packaging) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | =='Command Battleships'== | ||
Same as with Vol 2, the 2x "Command Battleships" are the Ahsgrimm / Asgrim. I'm going by Vol. 1R here, but yeah.[[User:Vympel|Vympel]] 14:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC) | Same as with Vol 2, the 2x "Command Battleships" are the Ahsgrimm / Asgrim. I'm going by Vol. 1R here, but yeah.[[User:Vympel|Vympel]] 14:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Can you verify? 1R is not the same as 1, so those ships aren't necessarily the same (but they probably are). [[User:Canary|Canary]] 15:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Sorry forgot about this - I can verify. http://www.hlj.com/product/WRS81001 - note the Japanese at the base. [[User:Vympel|Vympel]] 14:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Exact names?== | ||
| + | All of our articles for these have leading zeroes in the names (01 vs 1, 01R vs 1R, &c.), but the pictures i see online (including the scans on the forum) don't. Which one is right? It seems like the not-leading zeroes is. Maybe we did this just for sorting purposes (if so we can do the same sort-key thing we did with names)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nit-picky, i realise, but i wanted to make sure because i intend to create a citation template for these, and i want to make sure (a) that the citation itself looks right and (b) that the links go to the right pages. <span style="color: #bbb"> ♥</span> [[User:kine|<span style="color: #359fef !important;">kine</span>]] @ 12:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The zeroes need to be removed some time. (Not really a priority for me). They're a formatting quirk designed to keep the Fleet Files indexed in order, so that Fleet File 10 is not stuck between Fleet File 1 and Fleet File 2. [[User:Canary|Canary]] 01:30, 9 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::kk. I will move them later today (and add appropriate sort keys) if nobody beats me to it <span style="color: #bbb"> ♥</span> [[User:kine|<span style="color: #359fef !important;">kine</span>]] @ 11:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:43, 9 May 2011
'Command Battleships'
Same as with Vol 2, the 2x "Command Battleships" are the Ahsgrimm / Asgrim. I'm going by Vol. 1R here, but yeah.Vympel 14:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Can you verify? 1R is not the same as 1, so those ships aren't necessarily the same (but they probably are). Canary 15:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry forgot about this - I can verify. http://www.hlj.com/product/WRS81001 - note the Japanese at the base. Vympel 14:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Exact names?
All of our articles for these have leading zeroes in the names (01 vs 1, 01R vs 1R, &c.), but the pictures i see online (including the scans on the forum) don't. Which one is right? It seems like the not-leading zeroes is. Maybe we did this just for sorting purposes (if so we can do the same sort-key thing we did with names)?
Nit-picky, i realise, but i wanted to make sure because i intend to create a citation template for these, and i want to make sure (a) that the citation itself looks right and (b) that the links go to the right pages. ♥ kine @ 12:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- The zeroes need to be removed some time. (Not really a priority for me). They're a formatting quirk designed to keep the Fleet Files indexed in order, so that Fleet File 10 is not stuck between Fleet File 1 and Fleet File 2. Canary 01:30, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- kk. I will move them later today (and add appropriate sort keys) if nobody beats me to it ♥ kine @ 11:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
